This is important news gathering and shows how the power of the Internet allows anyone with a computer to cover communities that don't have local coverage -- just don't call it reporting. At least according to Cavanagh:
"I did not identify myself as anything because I didn’t, and still don’t, classify myself really as anything."Which of course makes things so much easier when you're reporting on an event. No need to get the other side. People will talk to you, despite the fact that they don't know you could be posting what they said. Some people, including me, would call that unethical behavior by a person who is acting very much like a reporter.
Others, like Jeff Jarvis, say, eh, the rules of journalism don't apply. "He's just a member of the community who's writing about his community."
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHe is just another member of the community writing about the community. And his lack of transparency and balance will erode trust within that community (when people find out they're being quoted in ways they didn't expect) and then he'll be marginalized as being on one side or the other of a debate, making it harder for him to gather useful information from anyone. Or, he will start changing his practices. That's where the Jarvis mantra breaks down: He thinks reporters adopted certain ethics in a vacuum, rather than in response to its many interactions with "real people".
ReplyDelete